Comments on: Busting the megapixel myth: How much resolution do you need for print?

By: Kirsten Ness

Kirsten Ness — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:38:35 +0000

Thanks Nigel. I really love photography and every advice is welcome! O : )

By: Shivanand Sharma

Shivanand Sharma — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:36:20 +0000

I like his blog but a mention of his name wouldn’t be such a good idea here. That’s because all threads relating to him are endless

By: Nigel

Nigel — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:33:28 +0000

Kirsten, search out Ken Rockwell. Just go through his website thoroughly. It’s not about the camera (it’s about you).

By: Kirsten Ness

Kirsten Ness — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:39:49 +0000

So true. What camera you suggest… not so expensive but pro? I want a camera that captures little details… Bugs, tiny flowers, etc…. ; ·)P.

By: XposurePro Photography Community

XposurePro Photography Community — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:23:57 +0000

Depends on the camera too. You can buy any 10MP point n shoot at best buy today and it won’t even compare to the quality that came out of my old 2MP D1 I had back in the 90’s … of course I paid $6,000 for the body. Megapixels is a feature more for the marketing department and not the photography department.

By: Kirsten Ness

Kirsten Ness — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:41:45 +0000

I wish I could leave a collaboration in your work at Mozilla.I like the tabs idea!
WoW! Great pictures in this page! Congratulations! Im a photography lover since ever but not as good as you!! Maybe some day because for a hobby is kind of expensive and my good camera is an old generation one: Nikon F4. Imagine! My digital camera is a HP 240. Excelent but not enough for what I want. All my blessings and maybe we can be in touch and share pictures. I can learn a lot from you

By: Kim Beck

Kim Beck — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:45:28 +0000

I have a 6MP Nikon D70s, and I made GREAT looking 75×50cm prints…