<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which camera do you own?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/</link>
	<description>§ APN — Digital Photography Tips §</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:57:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Perano</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-9351</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Perano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-9351</guid>
		<description>Pink, purple of pea green - who cares about the colour.  You bought a camera, went out and used it.  That is the important thing.  Sometimes you will bump into camera snobs.  These are the sort of people who look down upon you because you don’t have the fancy camera gear.  I have seen fantastic images taken on very cheap and rough cameras.  I have also seen rubbish pictures taken on camera worth thousand.

Adjustable lenses or zoom lenses are extremely useful things to use, but like everything in life, &quot;There is no such thing as a free lunch”.  Zooms are invariably a compromise of versatility vs. quality.  The convenience of being able to change the focal length is balanced by a lack of image quality.  Sure you can buy top of the line zoom lenses that give fantastic images – for fantastic $$.

An 18-55mm zoom will be very useful for landscape, architecture and a good all round general purpose lens.  I believe due to the size of the CMOS sensor the camera has a lens multiplier of 1.6.  This makes the zoom effectively a 28-88mm lenses.

A good guide for zoom is using the lens at the 18mm and the 55mm ends will produce the worst images.  The best place to use a zoom lens is about the middle of the lenses focal range, which will be about 35mm for your lens.  I am not saying don’t zoom in or out, just be aware that the best image quality is in the middle.  If possible use the good old fashion manual zoom function and either walk closer or further away to the subject.

Like most lenses they also have an optimum point for their Aperture.  Once again it is usually about the middle.  For most lenses its around the f8 – f11 point.  If you are not worried about the depth of field and the lighting is good try to stay close to f8 or f11.

You will hear some people tell you they can fix any image in Photoshop so don’t worry about things.  Sure Photoshop can fix a lot of mistakes, but why not get your image as good as you can when you take it.  Having Photoshop CS ‘whatever’ is no substitute for developing good photography skills and using them.

Suggestion – The first thing you should consider is put a filter on your lens.  Either a “Daylight” or “UV” filter.  These will have little effect on the images you shoot, BUT they will help protect the lens from dust and finger prints.  They may also help save you lens from minor knocks.  Better to replace a $30-$50 filter that became scratched than a $200-$500 lens.  Try to avoid removing this filter if you can.

My last bit of advice is joining a camera/photography club if you have not already done so.  You can learn a lot about photography here and they will encourage you to push your self in different directions and styles of photography.

Good luck and good shooting,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pink, purple of pea green &#8211; who cares about the colour.  You bought a camera, went out and used it.  That is the important thing.  Sometimes you will bump into camera snobs.  These are the sort of people who look down upon you because you don’t have the fancy camera gear.  I have seen fantastic images taken on very cheap and rough cameras.  I have also seen rubbish pictures taken on camera worth thousand.</p>
<p>Adjustable lenses or zoom lenses are extremely useful things to use, but like everything in life, &#8220;There is no such thing as a free lunch”.  Zooms are invariably a compromise of versatility vs. quality.  The convenience of being able to change the focal length is balanced by a lack of image quality.  Sure you can buy top of the line zoom lenses that give fantastic images – for fantastic $$.</p>
<p>An 18-55mm zoom will be very useful for landscape, architecture and a good all round general purpose lens.  I believe due to the size of the CMOS sensor the camera has a lens multiplier of 1.6.  This makes the zoom effectively a 28-88mm lenses.</p>
<p>A good guide for zoom is using the lens at the 18mm and the 55mm ends will produce the worst images.  The best place to use a zoom lens is about the middle of the lenses focal range, which will be about 35mm for your lens.  I am not saying don’t zoom in or out, just be aware that the best image quality is in the middle.  If possible use the good old fashion manual zoom function and either walk closer or further away to the subject.</p>
<p>Like most lenses they also have an optimum point for their Aperture.  Once again it is usually about the middle.  For most lenses its around the f8 – f11 point.  If you are not worried about the depth of field and the lighting is good try to stay close to f8 or f11.</p>
<p>You will hear some people tell you they can fix any image in Photoshop so don’t worry about things.  Sure Photoshop can fix a lot of mistakes, but why not get your image as good as you can when you take it.  Having Photoshop CS ‘whatever’ is no substitute for developing good photography skills and using them.</p>
<p>Suggestion – The first thing you should consider is put a filter on your lens.  Either a “Daylight” or “UV” filter.  These will have little effect on the images you shoot, BUT they will help protect the lens from dust and finger prints.  They may also help save you lens from minor knocks.  Better to replace a $30-$50 filter that became scratched than a $200-$500 lens.  Try to avoid removing this filter if you can.</p>
<p>My last bit of advice is joining a camera/photography club if you have not already done so.  You can learn a lot about photography here and they will encourage you to push your self in different directions and styles of photography.</p>
<p>Good luck and good shooting,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marizona</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-9344</link>
		<dc:creator>Marizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-9344</guid>
		<description>I just ordered a Canon XS Rebel.  I am so excited to use it!  In Christmas of &#039;08, I bought my first digital camera- A Canon Powershot SD 1100 IS in pink (hey, I was only 10 at the time!) and I absolutely love Canon. I read up on the Rebel and it looks like a wonderful camera. I was looking for a Rebel that was on the low end, since I&#039;m a kid and don&#039;t want to invest in something that my brothers or I might break. So that looked like the perfect choice, and I am looking forward to receiving it in the mail.  Could anyone give me any advice on how to use the 18-55mm lens? I&#039;m new to the adjustable lens realm of photography, and any help or guidance on that topic would be appreciated. Thanks so much- This is a great website!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ordered a Canon XS Rebel.  I am so excited to use it!  In Christmas of &#8216;08, I bought my first digital camera- A Canon Powershot SD 1100 IS in pink (hey, I was only 10 at the time!) and I absolutely love Canon. I read up on the Rebel and it looks like a wonderful camera. I was looking for a Rebel that was on the low end, since I&#8217;m a kid and don&#8217;t want to invest in something that my brothers or I might break. So that looked like the perfect choice, and I am looking forward to receiving it in the mail.  Could anyone give me any advice on how to use the 18-55mm lens? I&#8217;m new to the adjustable lens realm of photography, and any help or guidance on that topic would be appreciated. Thanks so much- This is a great website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivanand Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-9073</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivanand Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 05:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-9073</guid>
		<description>Great suggestions. Additionally I wanted to mention that digital cameras are not as sharp as film cameras. One reason is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advancedphotography.net/does-your-camera-really-have-the-quoted-resolution/&quot;&gt;Bayer Interpolation&lt;/a&gt;. Use the in-camera sharpening set to moderate or auto (turning it off may be fine if you are shooting RAW and want to process the capture sharpening later). There&#039;s no workaround for sharpening photos during post-processing (with certain exceptions).

Additionally, it could be otherwise and there&#039;s some fault in the equipment itself, so do compare your lens/camera with others of the same make before concluding anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great suggestions. Additionally I wanted to mention that digital cameras are not as sharp as film cameras. One reason is <a href="http://www.advancedphotography.net/does-your-camera-really-have-the-quoted-resolution/">Bayer Interpolation</a>. Use the in-camera sharpening set to moderate or auto (turning it off may be fine if you are shooting RAW and want to process the capture sharpening later). There&#8217;s no workaround for sharpening photos during post-processing (with certain exceptions).</p>
<p>Additionally, it could be otherwise and there&#8217;s some fault in the equipment itself, so do compare your lens/camera with others of the same make before concluding anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Perano</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-9070</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Perano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-9070</guid>
		<description>Hi Arafath, welcome to the wonderful photography.
First off I would suggest you investigate your local high schools for night classes on photography.  You can learn a wealth of information from these sorts of classes as well as interact with other keen photographers at a similar stage.

OK, so your images are not as sharp as you hope or expect.  Matt Matchura raised an excellent point about the apature of the lens.  Lenses tend to have a &#039;Sweet Spot&quot; where the lens is at its optimum, this is usually around f8 - f11.  This is where most lenses will produce their best result.
HOWEVER digital cameras, including SLRs will not create a sharp image.  The cameras will try to apply some average sharpening of the image, but not always the best.  If you want to get better results use Photoshop, (or whatever you’re using) and apply &quot;Unsharp&quot;.  Ironically this will sharpen the image.  Do not just whack it up to full or you will over sharpen the image and distort the result.
There are other basic things you can do to clean up the image with out chopping it up.  I wont go in to these here.  Night classes can help you here and so can various articles on this site and many others.

Big suggestion - some people take a view of, &#039;Who cares, I&#039;ll fix it later in photoshop&quot;.  Not a great attitude to develop.  There is only so much you can fix with a poor photo.
Try and get the best image you can when you take it.  This will improve you skills with photography and increase your chance of getting great images.
An extra 5 min taking a shot can save hours of agony behind the keyboard and an uncertain result.

Good luck and good shooting,
Paul P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arafath, welcome to the wonderful photography.<br />
First off I would suggest you investigate your local high schools for night classes on photography.  You can learn a wealth of information from these sorts of classes as well as interact with other keen photographers at a similar stage.</p>
<p>OK, so your images are not as sharp as you hope or expect.  Matt Matchura raised an excellent point about the apature of the lens.  Lenses tend to have a &#8216;Sweet Spot&#8221; where the lens is at its optimum, this is usually around f8 &#8211; f11.  This is where most lenses will produce their best result.<br />
HOWEVER digital cameras, including SLRs will not create a sharp image.  The cameras will try to apply some average sharpening of the image, but not always the best.  If you want to get better results use Photoshop, (or whatever you’re using) and apply &#8220;Unsharp&#8221;.  Ironically this will sharpen the image.  Do not just whack it up to full or you will over sharpen the image and distort the result.<br />
There are other basic things you can do to clean up the image with out chopping it up.  I wont go in to these here.  Night classes can help you here and so can various articles on this site and many others.</p>
<p>Big suggestion &#8211; some people take a view of, &#8216;Who cares, I&#8217;ll fix it later in photoshop&#8221;.  Not a great attitude to develop.  There is only so much you can fix with a poor photo.<br />
Try and get the best image you can when you take it.  This will improve you skills with photography and increase your chance of getting great images.<br />
An extra 5 min taking a shot can save hours of agony behind the keyboard and an uncertain result.</p>
<p>Good luck and good shooting,<br />
Paul P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Matchura</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-9065</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Matchura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 12:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-9065</guid>
		<description>Hello Arafath!  Welcome to the wonderful world of digital photography.  The 40D was my first foray into digital SLR imagery and I think it is a great camera.  When I fist started out with the system, I was puzzled for a bit as I expected sharper images as well.  Coming from a film background, I had to realize that there are some controls in the digital that help a lot.  Think through the way the camera takes the picture – 

First, light through the lens, lens to sensor, in camera computer processing, post processing on PC/Mac or whatever.  Not trying to make small any previous experience you have covering something so basic, so bear with me.  It pans out in the end.

You need to find the stop that your lens works best with.  I am not familiar with the 17-85, but I would suspect that between 6.4 and 11 you will find that the lens produces sharper images than when wide open or stopped down all the way.  My “kit” lens was the 28-135 and at f/8 it produced wonderfully sharp images, but open it was kind of soft.  Experimenting is the only way to find it, but that is the joy of the format!

Lens to sensor is moot if you are shooting off hand.  From a tripod, you can lock the mirror up and take out the slight vibration that snapping the shot causes to the camera.  I never had that shake cause any problems for me until I started shooting lunar images.  It is another thing to consider though, depending on your subject.

In camera processing is a key that I did not consider for a long time.  I found that the camera’s processor does a wonderful job sharpening images as they are written to the card.  It is quick, taking less than a few milliseconds.  Bump it up to 4 or 5 and I think you will start to see the camera come into its own.  Resist the urge to take it too far (6 or 7) as it will start to “over sharpen” and you will get “hard” images.  Again, experiment as it is cheap and part of the allure of these great cameras.

Post processing is a world unto itself, but the Canon software does a pretty good job I find.  Play around with it and I think you will start to see images that will really like.  It is all about finding the right settings and then developing a system where all of it is taken into account before each shutter click.  The main thing, enjoy!  Sorry so long guys and gals -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Arafath!  Welcome to the wonderful world of digital photography.  The 40D was my first foray into digital SLR imagery and I think it is a great camera.  When I fist started out with the system, I was puzzled for a bit as I expected sharper images as well.  Coming from a film background, I had to realize that there are some controls in the digital that help a lot.  Think through the way the camera takes the picture – </p>
<p>First, light through the lens, lens to sensor, in camera computer processing, post processing on PC/Mac or whatever.  Not trying to make small any previous experience you have covering something so basic, so bear with me.  It pans out in the end.</p>
<p>You need to find the stop that your lens works best with.  I am not familiar with the 17-85, but I would suspect that between 6.4 and 11 you will find that the lens produces sharper images than when wide open or stopped down all the way.  My “kit” lens was the 28-135 and at f/8 it produced wonderfully sharp images, but open it was kind of soft.  Experimenting is the only way to find it, but that is the joy of the format!</p>
<p>Lens to sensor is moot if you are shooting off hand.  From a tripod, you can lock the mirror up and take out the slight vibration that snapping the shot causes to the camera.  I never had that shake cause any problems for me until I started shooting lunar images.  It is another thing to consider though, depending on your subject.</p>
<p>In camera processing is a key that I did not consider for a long time.  I found that the camera’s processor does a wonderful job sharpening images as they are written to the card.  It is quick, taking less than a few milliseconds.  Bump it up to 4 or 5 and I think you will start to see the camera come into its own.  Resist the urge to take it too far (6 or 7) as it will start to “over sharpen” and you will get “hard” images.  Again, experiment as it is cheap and part of the allure of these great cameras.</p>
<p>Post processing is a world unto itself, but the Canon software does a pretty good job I find.  Play around with it and I think you will start to see images that will really like.  It is all about finding the right settings and then developing a system where all of it is taken into account before each shutter click.  The main thing, enjoy!  Sorry so long guys and gals -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arafath</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-9061</link>
		<dc:creator>Arafath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 08:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-9061</guid>
		<description>Hi I&#039;m very new in photography, But I did lots of experiments to learn more. But most of the time my photographs are not so sharp as i expect. I own Canon Eos 40D and the lens 17-85 mm with UV filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I&#8217;m very new in photography, But I did lots of experiments to learn more. But most of the time my photographs are not so sharp as i expect. I own Canon Eos 40D and the lens 17-85 mm with UV filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-7589</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-7589</guid>
		<description>I own an Olympus FE-26, 12 mega pixels, 3x optimal zoom, and it seems to have alot of gadgets on it I have not found yet. I also own a Kodak Easy Share CX7330, 3.1 mega pixels, 3x optical zoom. I change between the camera depending on what Im doing. If I want one for outdoors I use the Kodak (its older and I dont mind if it gets wet a bit). They both are Point and Shoot cameras. i am looking forward to one day owning an SR camera. 
I love to take pictures, mostly of my 2and 1/2 year old son, but I do get caught up in moments like snowstorms or fireworks. I also love trying to take pictures of the waves crashing on the rocks, sunsets, sunrises, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own an Olympus FE-26, 12 mega pixels, 3x optimal zoom, and it seems to have alot of gadgets on it I have not found yet. I also own a Kodak Easy Share CX7330, 3.1 mega pixels, 3x optical zoom. I change between the camera depending on what Im doing. If I want one for outdoors I use the Kodak (its older and I dont mind if it gets wet a bit). They both are Point and Shoot cameras. i am looking forward to one day owning an SR camera.<br />
I love to take pictures, mostly of my 2and 1/2 year old son, but I do get caught up in moments like snowstorms or fireworks. I also love trying to take pictures of the waves crashing on the rocks, sunsets, sunrises, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-7542</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-7542</guid>
		<description>I like my Nikon D80 and have had it for almost two years. Although I currently use the kit lenses, and will purchase the 18-200 lens soon, all my family and friends are amazed at my photographs. I recently took one sunset with a streak of clouds through the picture and shot several pictures of it using different white balance settings and results were very dramatic. I posted these on my myspace account and got rave reviews. Thanks for the nice site -- David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like my Nikon D80 and have had it for almost two years. Although I currently use the kit lenses, and will purchase the 18-200 lens soon, all my family and friends are amazed at my photographs. I recently took one sunset with a streak of clouds through the picture and shot several pictures of it using different white balance settings and results were very dramatic. I posted these on my myspace account and got rave reviews. Thanks for the nice site &#8212; David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Perano</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-7321</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Perano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-7321</guid>
		<description>When I buy a new lens I always buy a basic UV Or SkyLight filter at the same time.  This goes on to the new lens before it goes out of the shop.

With digital cameras and the likes of Photoshop, etc. the only other filter you should seriously condiser is a polarising filter.  This filter reduces glare and make colours more saturated, very much the same as a pair of polarising sunglasses do for your eyes.  It can also cut out a lot of reflection off glass and water.  The polarising filters affect is one thing Photoshop can&#039;t recreate - OK there is no doubt some people who will boast that they can do it.  Just use the filter, its so much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I buy a new lens I always buy a basic UV Or SkyLight filter at the same time.  This goes on to the new lens before it goes out of the shop.</p>
<p>With digital cameras and the likes of Photoshop, etc. the only other filter you should seriously condiser is a polarising filter.  This filter reduces glare and make colours more saturated, very much the same as a pair of polarising sunglasses do for your eyes.  It can also cut out a lot of reflection off glass and water.  The polarising filters affect is one thing Photoshop can&#8217;t recreate &#8211; OK there is no doubt some people who will boast that they can do it.  Just use the filter, its so much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivanand Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-2/#comment-7286</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivanand Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-7286</guid>
		<description>Congrats on your new purchase. You&#039;d want to put a &quot;UV&quot; filter or a &quot;Clear&quot; filter at least. The intention is to protect your camera&#039;s lens. Later as your photography gets refined you&#039;ll know &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.advancedphotography.net/all-you-need-to-know-and-use-filters/&quot;&gt;which filters you&#039;d require&lt;/a&gt;. I&#039;d strongly recommend you to suscribe to our blog via email or RSS to get the latest photography tips and techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on your new purchase. You&#8217;d want to put a &#8220;UV&#8221; filter or a &#8220;Clear&#8221; filter at least. The intention is to protect your camera&#8217;s lens. Later as your photography gets refined you&#8217;ll know <a href="http://www.advancedphotography.net/all-you-need-to-know-and-use-filters/">which filters you&#8217;d require</a>. I&#8217;d strongly recommend you to suscribe to our blog via email or RSS to get the latest photography tips and techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karan</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-7278</link>
		<dc:creator>Karan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-7278</guid>
		<description>Hi

I have a Nikon D3000, I just bought the camera, I was wondering if I should get filters for it. And any good texts to read about the techniques etc.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I have a Nikon D3000, I just bought the camera, I was wondering if I should get filters for it. And any good texts to read about the techniques etc.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hirak Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6382</link>
		<dc:creator>Hirak Ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6382</guid>
		<description>Thank you both Mr. Shivanand Sharma &amp; Mr. Matthew Matchura.But i really don&#039;t understand what you want to mean by used equipment.I&#039;m a new &amp; on my way to learning so can&#039;t understand,sorry sir.What do you say should i buy the D3000 or not?What if i buy that,use &amp; get som experience &amp; then go for a suitable lenses?I was prefering the zoom because i travel in forests &amp; sanctuary a lot so want to capture the photos of animals that stay in a long distance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you both Mr. Shivanand Sharma &amp; Mr. Matthew Matchura.But i really don&#8217;t understand what you want to mean by used equipment.I&#8217;m a new &amp; on my way to learning so can&#8217;t understand,sorry sir.What do you say should i buy the D3000 or not?What if i buy that,use &amp; get som experience &amp; then go for a suitable lenses?I was prefering the zoom because i travel in forests &amp; sanctuary a lot so want to capture the photos of animals that stay in a long distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivanand Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6372</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivanand Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6372</guid>
		<description>Excellent suggestion by Matthew. &lt;em&gt;(Phew, how could I forget that.)&lt;/em&gt; Since you are on a budget and learning, go for used equipment. Use it, abuse it and save for lenses. Soon you&#039;ll be at comfort with the equipment and the science. Later you can go for what ever you&#039;ll need at that stage.

For zoom requirements, 15x is really too much to ask for. They are just to lure the users of consumer segment cameras. You certainly can go for a 15x zoom and I mention it here so we all know that it is possible. That would be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tamron.com/B003special/index.html&quot;&gt;B003 15x zoom lens by Tamron for Nikon and Canon&lt;/a&gt;. However you may want to reconsider why you need that level of zoom at all. The price of this lens is on the higher side of $600 for new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent suggestion by Matthew. <em>(Phew, how could I forget that.)</em> Since you are on a budget and learning, go for used equipment. Use it, abuse it and save for lenses. Soon you&#8217;ll be at comfort with the equipment and the science. Later you can go for what ever you&#8217;ll need at that stage.</p>
<p>For zoom requirements, 15x is really too much to ask for. They are just to lure the users of consumer segment cameras. You certainly can go for a 15x zoom and I mention it here so we all know that it is possible. That would be the <a href="http://www.tamron.com/B003special/index.html">B003 15x zoom lens by Tamron for Nikon and Canon</a>. However you may want to reconsider why you need that level of zoom at all. The price of this lens is on the higher side of $600 for new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Matchura</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6371</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Matchura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6371</guid>
		<description>Hello Hirak.  Just a thought, but have you looked at used equipment?  You could probably get a deal on a higher end body that has some mileage on it.  It might allow you save a little bit of money towards a really nice lens.  Bodies in the DSLR world are transient at best.  They are &quot;obsolete&quot; within a year of release.  Lenses, on the other hand, tend to hold their value for a long time.  I shoot Canon and have several &quot;L&quot; lenses that I have bought over the years.  They are holding 95% of their value.  The glass with travel with you through your years of photography practice.  My bodies hold nowhere near the value, having lost about 50% of their purchase price in the few years I have owned them.  Something you might be able to take advantage of on your student&#039;s budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Hirak.  Just a thought, but have you looked at used equipment?  You could probably get a deal on a higher end body that has some mileage on it.  It might allow you save a little bit of money towards a really nice lens.  Bodies in the DSLR world are transient at best.  They are &#8220;obsolete&#8221; within a year of release.  Lenses, on the other hand, tend to hold their value for a long time.  I shoot Canon and have several &#8220;L&#8221; lenses that I have bought over the years.  They are holding 95% of their value.  The glass with travel with you through your years of photography practice.  My bodies hold nowhere near the value, having lost about 50% of their purchase price in the few years I have owned them.  Something you might be able to take advantage of on your student&#8217;s budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hirak Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6370</link>
		<dc:creator>Hirak Ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6370</guid>
		<description>Mr. Shivanand Sharma,thank you so much for your valuable &amp; kind comments.I&#039;ve realised the difference between a Non-DSLR &amp; a DSLR.Nikon is my personal favourite too.I&#039;ve decided to buy Nikon&#039;s D3000 DSLR,it suits my budget of Rs 30,000 (With Nikon D3000 Kit With AF-S DX 18-55mm VR f/3.5-5.6G).My first choice was Nikon D700 but as i&#039;m still a student thats why can&#039;t afford that large amount of money.I need an information.What is the price of a Nikon lens that have a suficient amount of zoom (Atleast 15x or higher)? If i&#039;m wasting your valuable time then i&#039;m sorry sir.I&#039;m a photography enthusiast &amp; using a DSLR is my long time dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Shivanand Sharma,thank you so much for your valuable &amp; kind comments.I&#8217;ve realised the difference between a Non-DSLR &amp; a DSLR.Nikon is my personal favourite too.I&#8217;ve decided to buy Nikon&#8217;s D3000 DSLR,it suits my budget of Rs 30,000 (With Nikon D3000 Kit With AF-S DX 18-55mm VR f/3.5-5.6G).My first choice was Nikon D700 but as i&#8217;m still a student thats why can&#8217;t afford that large amount of money.I need an information.What is the price of a Nikon lens that have a suficient amount of zoom (Atleast 15x or higher)? If i&#8217;m wasting your valuable time then i&#8217;m sorry sir.I&#8217;m a photography enthusiast &amp; using a DSLR is my long time dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivanand Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6363</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivanand Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6363</guid>
		<description>Hirak: The point and shoots come with all the bells and whistles to impress the end-user with features. But DSLRs only pitch the professional photographic quality that you get in the results. Thus when considering DSLRs it is very important to couple them with good lenses (one reason why the pros choose to buy a DSLR and a non-kit lens). When you go for a zoom lens with a DSLR it will put the point and shoots to shame.

For that budget you can go for a basic DSLR (less features but still professional image quality). You&#039;ll have to stick to the kit-lens. But wait a few months and you should be able to save more and buy a non-kit lens that suits your needs.

Canon vs Nikon has been an everlasting war and none of them is a clear winner. You need to see for yourself what you like. I don&#039;t have much experience with Canons but I absolutely love my Nikons.

You can certainly upgrade to a compact digital camera with megazoom. But in the end they are still considered toys and in the long run (and may be only a few months down the line) you&#039;ll see the need for a DSLR again. BTW - mega(zoom) is nothing more than a fancy feature. Get a DSLR and then save and get a zoom lens if you are into wild-life photography or similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hirak: The point and shoots come with all the bells and whistles to impress the end-user with features. But DSLRs only pitch the professional photographic quality that you get in the results. Thus when considering DSLRs it is very important to couple them with good lenses (one reason why the pros choose to buy a DSLR and a non-kit lens). When you go for a zoom lens with a DSLR it will put the point and shoots to shame.</p>
<p>For that budget you can go for a basic DSLR (less features but still professional image quality). You&#8217;ll have to stick to the kit-lens. But wait a few months and you should be able to save more and buy a non-kit lens that suits your needs.</p>
<p>Canon vs Nikon has been an everlasting war and none of them is a clear winner. You need to see for yourself what you like. I don&#8217;t have much experience with Canons but I absolutely love my Nikons.</p>
<p>You can certainly upgrade to a compact digital camera with megazoom. But in the end they are still considered toys and in the long run (and may be only a few months down the line) you&#8217;ll see the need for a DSLR again. BTW &#8211; mega(zoom) is nothing more than a fancy feature. Get a DSLR and then save and get a zoom lens if you are into wild-life photography or similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter kovak</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6352</link>
		<dc:creator>peter kovak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6352</guid>
		<description>Well, Hirak, after experiencing the shooting with a DSLR I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll be ready to go back to a point and shoot. I upgraded to DSLR from what was supposed to be the best non-DSLR camera: Fuji s100 fs and I still bless the day when I&#039;ve decided to do it. This morning UPS brought me my new Sigma 70-200 f2.8 and I was happy like a kid with his new toy (and I&#039;m 50!).
   I don&#039;t know what is Rs 30,000 (how many $), but a good lens from the very beginning would help a lot. I mean something like the Nikkor 16-85 VR or Sony 16-105, which are excellent walk-around lenses with good zoom range. Don&#039;t forget that when the zoom ratio is more than 3x, you begin to pay the price of image quality. There are lenses like Nikkor 18-200 VR or Sony 18-250 with good user reviews, but I, personally, wouldn&#039;t buy them. I use the Sony 16-105 (sometimes with a 0.5x wide angle converter), the Minolta 50 f1.7, and now also the Sigma 70-200 (sometimes with a 1.4x teleconverter that I&#039;ll buy soon). Think well, but, if you love photography, don&#039;t remain at the level of P&amp;S. 
   Good Luck !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Hirak, after experiencing the shooting with a DSLR I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll be ready to go back to a point and shoot. I upgraded to DSLR from what was supposed to be the best non-DSLR camera: Fuji s100 fs and I still bless the day when I&#8217;ve decided to do it. This morning UPS brought me my new Sigma 70-200 f2.8 and I was happy like a kid with his new toy (and I&#8217;m 50!).<br />
   I don&#8217;t know what is Rs 30,000 (how many $), but a good lens from the very beginning would help a lot. I mean something like the Nikkor 16-85 VR or Sony 16-105, which are excellent walk-around lenses with good zoom range. Don&#8217;t forget that when the zoom ratio is more than 3x, you begin to pay the price of image quality. There are lenses like Nikkor 18-200 VR or Sony 18-250 with good user reviews, but I, personally, wouldn&#8217;t buy them. I use the Sony 16-105 (sometimes with a 0.5x wide angle converter), the Minolta 50 f1.7, and now also the Sigma 70-200 (sometimes with a 1.4x teleconverter that I&#8217;ll buy soon). Think well, but, if you love photography, don&#8217;t remain at the level of P&amp;S.<br />
   Good Luck !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hirak Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6349</link>
		<dc:creator>Hirak Ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6349</guid>
		<description>Hi,i am using Nikon Coolpix L20 digital camera for the last 3 year,but want to upgrade to a DSLR.But i&#039;m confused wheater to buy it or not because DSLR don&#039;t have extra zoom.My budget is Rs 30,000.Please recommend fron Nikon Or Canon.My first preference is stuning image quality &amp; second is a good optical zoom (atleast 10X or more)
Please say wheater i should buy a DSLR or upgrade to a compact digital camera with megazoom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,i am using Nikon Coolpix L20 digital camera for the last 3 year,but want to upgrade to a DSLR.But i&#8217;m confused wheater to buy it or not because DSLR don&#8217;t have extra zoom.My budget is Rs 30,000.Please recommend fron Nikon Or Canon.My first preference is stuning image quality &amp; second is a good optical zoom (atleast 10X or more)<br />
Please say wheater i should buy a DSLR or upgrade to a compact digital camera with megazoom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6348</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6348</guid>
		<description>So far, I&#039;m just a hobbyist, but have done a few small portrait jobs for friends and family.  I have a Canon T1i with a 24-105mm L and a 50mm 1.8 (hoping to upgrade that to the 1.4 soon).  So far I absolutely LOVE my 24-105 lens.

I participated in a photography workshop recently, and it made me wish I would have waited a little longer to upgrade my XTi to a 50D instead of the T1i.  I&#039;m curious about shooting in full frame.  I got the T1i because of its video capabilities.  I have a 1 year old, and I was missing the ease of catching little videos of her with my camera rather than the camcorder since my camera is ALWAYS out.  

I am LOVING this website.  The articles are wonderful, and are providing so much useful information for the level of photographer I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, I&#8217;m just a hobbyist, but have done a few small portrait jobs for friends and family.  I have a Canon T1i with a 24-105mm L and a 50mm 1.8 (hoping to upgrade that to the 1.4 soon).  So far I absolutely LOVE my 24-105 lens.</p>
<p>I participated in a photography workshop recently, and it made me wish I would have waited a little longer to upgrade my XTi to a 50D instead of the T1i.  I&#8217;m curious about shooting in full frame.  I got the T1i because of its video capabilities.  I have a 1 year old, and I was missing the ease of catching little videos of her with my camera rather than the camcorder since my camera is ALWAYS out.  </p>
<p>I am LOVING this website.  The articles are wonderful, and are providing so much useful information for the level of photographer I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>Like the Linda above, I upgraded to a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 from the FZ50.  I love both cameras, but mostly use the 28 now.  I shoot RAW and I haven&#039;t found another superzoom that shoots RAW.  I am a board member and instructor for a 850-member camera club and have convinced a lot of people that this is the camera to own if you don&#039;t want to carry around the weight of a DSLR and several lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the Linda above, I upgraded to a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 from the FZ50.  I love both cameras, but mostly use the 28 now.  I shoot RAW and I haven&#8217;t found another superzoom that shoots RAW.  I am a board member and instructor for a 850-member camera club and have convinced a lot of people that this is the camera to own if you don&#8217;t want to carry around the weight of a DSLR and several lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Donahue</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-6233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Donahue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-6233</guid>
		<description>I have a Nikon D300 with a Nikon 18-200 VRII Lens.  I also have a 70-300 VR and a 50mm 1.8 Lens.  Currently I am doing volunteer work with an Animal Services Organization, Publishing Fotos on local websites in Trying to get Dogs and Cats who have been dis-owned into new homes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Nikon D300 with a Nikon 18-200 VRII Lens.  I also have a 70-300 VR and a 50mm 1.8 Lens.  Currently I am doing volunteer work with an Animal Services Organization, Publishing Fotos on local websites in Trying to get Dogs and Cats who have been dis-owned into new homes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-5768</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-5768</guid>
		<description>I use only Pentax cameras,Have have two film cameras in the past, I think they are the best keep serect in the photo industry.I have a K200 with a 18-250 DA lens.I;am looking to buy a super wide tele now, don&#039;t know which one yet, 10-17 DA or 12-24 Da, any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use only Pentax cameras,Have have two film cameras in the past, I think they are the best keep serect in the photo industry.I have a K200 with a 18-250 DA lens.I;am looking to buy a super wide tele now, don&#8217;t know which one yet, 10-17 DA or 12-24 Da, any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-5364</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-5364</guid>
		<description>I currently have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 (10.1M, 18x-zoom, shoots RAW).  A great camera.  I moved up to the 28 from the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 (8.1M, 12x-zoom, also shoots RAW).  I love these cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 (10.1M, 18x-zoom, shoots RAW).  A great camera.  I moved up to the 28 from the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 (8.1M, 12x-zoom, also shoots RAW).  I love these cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-5352</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-5352</guid>
		<description>This site has real possibilities as far the current quality of the articles are concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site has real possibilities as far the current quality of the articles are concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-5351</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-5351</guid>
		<description>My first camera&#039;s were Canon&#039;s, 35mm film each one with a lens attached that I carried in a backpack.  Of the four I liked the F-1.  They were all stolen and so I started working with and 8X10 Deardorff view camera which I used for more than 20 years along with a Rolliflex and eventually a Contax T1. I became disabled and could nolonger carry the view camera or st in my darkroom to develo film or prints. I finally bought a Sony DSC-S85 4.2mp and ventured into digital.  I advanced to a 7mp and finally I purchased a 10.2mp Leica which I have settled on as my main camera along with the Contax T1 which I shoot slide film then digitize the slides.  I have had many ups and downs but have found my Leica tripod mounted on a Manfrotto tripod with a Bogen head shooting RAW and producing 16 X 20 B &amp; W prints to be a very satisfactory along with the Contax T1 rangefinder color 6 X 9 prints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first camera&#8217;s were Canon&#8217;s, 35mm film each one with a lens attached that I carried in a backpack.  Of the four I liked the F-1.  They were all stolen and so I started working with and 8X10 Deardorff view camera which I used for more than 20 years along with a Rolliflex and eventually a Contax T1. I became disabled and could nolonger carry the view camera or st in my darkroom to develo film or prints. I finally bought a Sony DSC-S85 4.2mp and ventured into digital.  I advanced to a 7mp and finally I purchased a 10.2mp Leica which I have settled on as my main camera along with the Contax T1 which I shoot slide film then digitize the slides.  I have had many ups and downs but have found my Leica tripod mounted on a Manfrotto tripod with a Bogen head shooting RAW and producing 16 X 20 B &amp; W prints to be a very satisfactory along with the Contax T1 rangefinder color 6 X 9 prints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Lozes</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Lozes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>I just recently purchased the Canon SLR Rebel T1i. My husband is a photographer and has the Canon D30 and its great to be able to use his lenses. I am loving my first SLR!  It makes a huge difference in the quality of my photos, and gives me a great range in taking the kinds of photos I am interested in. In regards to cam phones, the megapixel is not what makes decent pics. Love my blackberry cam. I had a samsung with 5 mp. But it took awful photos! thanks for the great articles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently purchased the Canon SLR Rebel T1i. My husband is a photographer and has the Canon D30 and its great to be able to use his lenses. I am loving my first SLR!  It makes a huge difference in the quality of my photos, and gives me a great range in taking the kinds of photos I am interested in. In regards to cam phones, the megapixel is not what makes decent pics. Love my blackberry cam. I had a samsung with 5 mp. But it took awful photos! thanks for the great articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>When my old Minolta Dynax 7000i finally curled up its toes in late 2007 it signaled a good time to finally go digital.  Having a number of Dynax lenses ranging from wide to 500mm and 100mm macro I was in a bit captive market.
One Sony Alpha 700 later ...  It seemed a bit silly to buy anything else and go either sideways from the 7000i or backwards.
As for buying Canon of Nikon - hey if anyone wants to donate $10,000-15,000 so i can rebuy all my lenses, I&#039;ll happily do it  :-)))
Since the change I have bought the Sony 11-18mm very wide zoom - lots of fun.  Recently the new Sony 58 flash.
Still have a &#039;mature&#039; Minolta SRT101 and a wee Mamiya 645.  Both get wheeled out from time to to time to have some film fun - helps to keep me grounded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my old Minolta Dynax 7000i finally curled up its toes in late 2007 it signaled a good time to finally go digital.  Having a number of Dynax lenses ranging from wide to 500mm and 100mm macro I was in a bit captive market.<br />
One Sony Alpha 700 later &#8230;  It seemed a bit silly to buy anything else and go either sideways from the 7000i or backwards.<br />
As for buying Canon of Nikon &#8211; hey if anyone wants to donate $10,000-15,000 so i can rebuy all my lenses, I&#8217;ll happily do it  <img src='http://www.advancedphotography.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))<br />
Since the change I have bought the Sony 11-18mm very wide zoom &#8211; lots of fun.  Recently the new Sony 58 flash.<br />
Still have a &#8216;mature&#8217; Minolta SRT101 and a wee Mamiya 645.  Both get wheeled out from time to to time to have some film fun &#8211; helps to keep me grounded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivanand Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-4490</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivanand Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-4490</guid>
		<description>You bring up some interesting point. The difference between the D300 and the D3 is the full-frame sensor (means more sensor surface to capture light) and thus results in some wonderful available light performance. Night lights look great and even at high ISO there is no visible noise. However D3 is really costly. A preferred alternative could have been D700. However other than this there is no difference in image quality and is just the low-light performance and the money that you have to shell out.

Congratulations on your new purchase. Do drop us a few lines once you have had some time to spend with it. And do not forget to share the photographs in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/groups_join.gne?id=1195441@N22&quot;&gt;our Flickr group&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up some interesting point. The difference between the D300 and the D3 is the full-frame sensor (means more sensor surface to capture light) and thus results in some wonderful available light performance. Night lights look great and even at high ISO there is no visible noise. However D3 is really costly. A preferred alternative could have been D700. However other than this there is no difference in image quality and is just the low-light performance and the money that you have to shell out.</p>
<p>Congratulations on your new purchase. Do drop us a few lines once you have had some time to spend with it. And do not forget to share the photographs in <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups_join.gne?id=1195441@N22">our Flickr group</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert McNeil</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert McNeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>Just upgraded to the Nikon D300 and only had it two days so i have not got to much to say about
it yet i went for the D300 because if i went to the D3 i would have to upgrade the lens as well
and by all reports there not a great difrence between the two cameras time will tell if i made
the right move</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just upgraded to the Nikon D300 and only had it two days so i have not got to much to say about<br />
it yet i went for the D300 because if i went to the D3 i would have to upgrade the lens as well<br />
and by all reports there not a great difrence between the two cameras time will tell if i made<br />
the right move</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCR</title>
		<link>http://www.advancedphotography.net/which-camera-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-4486</link>
		<dc:creator>PCR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancedphotography.net/?p=212#comment-4486</guid>
		<description>Looking at a Canon 500D, not sure what lenses I&#039;ll find necessary until I get further advice on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at a Canon 500D, not sure what lenses I&#8217;ll find necessary until I get further advice on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
